Sahi Jobs – Finding the right job

Helping you find your dream job

The Adverse Effects of Technology – Part II

with 2 comments

My earlier article entitled “Adverse Effect of Technology” resulted in an avalanche of e-mail from readers, all predominantly favorable. In that article I put forth an observation that “As the use of technology increases, social skills decreases.” I want to take this concept a little further herein.

Before we had computers and the sophisticated communication devices we now have in the work place, there was a lot of manual processing involved. Orders were processed manually, as were shipments, financial transactions, and many other business processes. All involved considerable paperwork with documents, reports, journals, logs, spreadsheets, etc. We of course used the latest technology of the day which included such things as typewriters, adding machines, filing systems, cash registers, and tabulating equipment. Nonetheless, the emphasis was on manual processing which meant we were forced to work together, like it or not, hence the need for better interpersonal communications. In other words, out of sheer necessity we were forced to socialize in order for the company to function properly. Since the business processes were so laborious, companies would worry about losing time on a task, hence the need for long range planning.

Today, electronic automation is used to implement just about every business process in a company. The idea of operating without computer support or electronic communications is unimaginable. True, such devices have been able to expedite the processes, but in doing so people no longer have to interact in order to fulfill their jobs, hence the breakdown in interpersonal communications. And because our tasks are not as laborious as they once were, the technology allows us to make changes on the fly. Consequently, long range planning has been sacrificed and reactionary management practices have taken their place. In reality, long range planning is still very much needed in order to remain competitive in a world economy, but this is not the mindset in today’s corporate cultures anymore.

As I mentioned in my article, we have developed an overt dependency on our technology which results in three areas of concern: first, that a company comes to a standstill when the power is disrupted (we can no longer perform the business processes); second, it tends to emphasize short-term planning as opposed to long range (whereby we are content to perform small tasks), and; third, basic interpersonal relations are negatively affected because we are no longer forced to interact with others.

Again, I am most definitely not anti-technology, but neither am I anti-human socialization. If I have learned anything in the 30+ years of experience in the information systems industry, it is that people matter most of all; that it is people who use information, not technology; that projects and business processes are executed by human-beings, not robots; that it is the human-being which is of paramount importance in everything.

I have always found it rather easy to teach people technology, In fact, it is relatively easy to program a person to use a particular device. But it is much more difficult to teach them the socialization skills to effectively interact with others. This is why our corporate slogan remains, “Software for the finest computer – the Mind.”

If you would like to discuss this with me in more depth, please do not hesitate to send me an e-mail.

Tim Bryce
http://www.articlesbase.com/technology-articles/the-adverse-effects-of-technology-part-ii-185220.html

Written by admin

February 27th, 2010 at 2:19 pm

Posted in part time jobs

2 Responses to 'The Adverse Effects of Technology – Part II'

Subscribe to comments with RSS or TrackBack to 'The Adverse Effects of Technology – Part II'.

  1. Macro Economics Help Plzzzz ASAP?
    Recently, President Obama pushed his massive fiscal stimulus package of $787 through the Congress and later passed by the House and Senate, whose centerpiece was spending most of this stimulus funds in repairing and building infrastructure in transportation, healthcare, science and technology, and education. Obama also urged to make a modest tax cut for middle-income families making a household income less than $250K per year. The push for this combined package of spending and partial tax cut was also criticized by several opponents in politics, academia, and businesses on the ground that the spending was too large under government financing to balance the growing budget deficit and debt that might threaten future stability of the country.

    4) A) What possible macroeconomic arguments might President Obama use to defend his $787 billion fiscal stimulus package as a part of his economic recovery plans?

    B) Why do you think the critics were so much concerned that this stimulus package might be bad economic policy, and not just for the US, but for the world economy? Does it sound to have a trickle down adverse effect in the current or future financial stability in the US and the World economy in 2008?

    C) What would happen to the growth rate of the money supply if foreigners lost confidence in the US dollar as a result of recent financial crisis in the US economy and the Fed was trying nonetheless to maintain its current historic low federal funds rate target? Explain briefly.

    d) Using the Keynesian Cross model diagram (The diagram with 45 degree line by splitting AD (C+I+G+NX) on the vertical axis and RGDP on the horizontal axis, See in Ch. 9 of the text book) and equation, critically and briefly illustrate the short run and long run economic impact of Obama’s stimulus package of $787 billion. (Hint: The impact will be in terms of major macroeconomic variables of US economy such as GDP growth, unemployment rate, interest rates, and inflation.)

    Aarti

    27 Feb 10 at 2:19 pm

  2. A) The argument is basically Keynesian. We’re in a liquidity trap that can only be fixed with huge budget deficits.

    B) Because you spend it now but pay for it later. The pay for it later part is what concerns people. Unfortunately, the US can tax not only it’s citizens but the entire world. Inflation is a form of taxation (see "seigniorage") and US inflation will necessarily cause world inflation.

    C) The Fed is forced to buy the US government’s debt (since the foreigner won’t). That increases the money supply. An increase in the supply of US dollars vs. the same amount of foreign currency, means there are more dollar per amount of foreign currency%
    References :

    Edaphos

    27 Feb 10 at 7:21 pm

Leave a Reply